|
Mad Rabbit Update The Forest Service held a Mad Rabbit objection resolution meeting this past Monday, November 20. The goal of the meeting was not to repeat the objections one had already submitted to the reviewing officer (Forest Supervisor Russ Bacon), but to generate proposals of how the objections could be resolved. All parties who had standing were invited to participate, which included Keep Routt Wild. We generated an updated compromise proposal which you can read here. It was subsequently endorsed by several local and statewide conservation groups, and was the single most adopted resolution proposal of the meeting. It differs from our previous proposal by allowing three trails to remain within the Long Park roadless area, as long as these were positioned within 1/2 mile of US40 and were subject to elk calving closures, regardless of snow depth, from May 15 through June 30. We had previously asked that these trails be moved to the south of US40. The entire project would be managed, in cooperation with the USFS and CPW, under adaptive management protocols to ensure the protection of wildlife and Colorado Roadless Area characteristics. The advantage of this proposal to the Forest Service is that this proposal does not require a new EA (Environmental Assessment) to adopt, since it is a proper subset of the current draft EA. This would allow the Forest Service to choose this option and move forward. We don’t know what the Forest Service will do, but we did get insight into the rest of the process. By December 11, the Forest Service will publish written responses to all objections. This could be published earlier, but December 11 is the regulatory deadline. Some time after the publication, the reviewing officer will give direction to the responsible official, District Ranger Michael Woodbridge. Then some time after that the final record of decision will be made and approved. While USFS regulations are dictating the December 11 deadline for objection responses, there are no regulatory deadlines for when the reviewing officer gives direction or when the final record of decision is made. While we are hoping for the best, we are preparing for the worst. As we stated before presenting our compromise proposal, we do not believe the current proposal is legally defensible. Furthermore, the precedents set by the project threaten wildlife and roadless area protections across the state of Colorado. They cannot be allowed to stand. This is why a decision by the Forest Service to move forward with the current proposal doesn’t end the controversy- it just moves it to a different venue. All of this can be avoided if the Forest Service adopts our compromise proposal, and we encourage them to do so. We have engaged with our legal team at KKR to understand our options, and are prepared to move forward. These options are not inexpensive. This is why this Colorado Gives Day we ask that you consider a donation to Keep Routt Wild so we can continue this fight for wildlife and wild places, not only in Routt County, but across the state of Colorado. Thank you.
|