|
The Steamboat Springs City Council approved Mad Rabbit funding 5-2 this past Tuesday, December 3. While we are disappointed in this result, we recognize that once the Mad Rabbit NEPA is approved, any party can fund it. We are more disappointed that increased funding for city trails was declined. “The steady stream of residents testifying before the Steamboat Springs City Council late Tuesday night all spoke of their appreciation for trails. But there was friction over where those trails should be built and whether publicly funded recreation should be designed for locals or visitors,” wrote Jason Blevins in the above Colorado Sun article. “It’s a contentious narrative playing out across the Western Slope as residents of busy mountain towns push elected leaders to focus more on the local quality of life and less on the visitor experience. That’s a bold move in communities built by tourist dollars. And it’s a sign of the changing tides in tourism-based economies.” We recommend reading the whole thing. So, what is the status of Mad Rabbit? Mad Rabbit has still not received final approval from the Forest Service, though we expect it soon. As we previously reported, Forest Service Supervisor Russ Bacon issued 15 instructions to District Ranger Michael Woodbridge a year ago that need to be completed before Mad Rabbit is approved. Most consequential of those instructions was development of an adaptive management plan. “I instruct the Responsible Official to ensure an adaptive management plan is collaboratively developed by the Forest Service and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources prior to Forest Service approval to start construction and implementation, that would address objectors concerns related to unauthorized off-trail use, violations of seasonal closures and recreation setting in addition to impacts on wildlife or habitat, including developing a potential phased approach to trail construction based on this adaptive management plan.” A draft of that plan has been completed and can be read here. The agreement on this plan led to Colorado DNR and CPW retracting their objection to the project. The adaptive management plan calls for building Mad Rabbit in three phases, with gated checkpoints before proceeding to the next checkpoint. In theory, a well-resourced adaptive management plan can keep a project within the bounds of no significant impact. Our input to the Forest Service and CPW was to make sure there is adequate funding year after year to perform the monitoring needed to assure the project proceeds incrementally within those bounds. With the Forest Service facing serious budget constraints which has led to eliminating non-fire related seasonal workers nationwide, it is not clear where the necessary resourcing is coming from. 2A funds cannot be used for this purpose. Keep Routt Wild can help. Making the adaptive management plan successful is something proponents and skeptics of Mad Rabbit should both agree on. Most urgently needed is the establishment of pre-Mad Rabbit construction baselines, which requires monitoring equipment and manpower. Between our own resources, some promising grant opportunities, and an extensive volunteer network, we believe we could help bring the necessary resources to bear to kick off this program. All of this would be under the direction of the Forest Service and CPW. We’re sharpening our pencils on the particulars to make this offer to the Forest Service and should do so soon. Making the adaptive management plan successful is a key element to preserving wildlife and wild places in the project area, and making it wildly successful would set a model for the entire Rocky Mountain west. Stay tuned.
|